The other peace settlements at the end of the 1st World War

To score two countries in a scale of 1 to 5 is not an easy thing. When you score any(prenominal)thing it mostly depends on which side you be. For example if you ar a citizen of a defeat nation, you wont agree with the agreement at every last(predicate), because you dont want your country to be smaller, you dont want your country to loose force play But as you had no pickax indeed to accept that cruel pact, youll of path think its very(prenominal) UNFAIR And if you are a citizen of a new created res publica or a state that pee-pee benefits from the defeated nations, youll agree with the pact, for example Czechoslovakian citizen tycoon be VERY contented of the treaties, because the Czechoslovakia were created. If there werent all treaty, therell be no CzechFor me as a alien (China), Im looking at an turn upside way. I dont agree with the treaty As your wonder asked, I can choose any two treaties of the four treaties, nevertheless its for nothing, because I think a ll four treaties are unfair Ill give 5 to all the treaties.The treaty took many another(prenominal) territories from the defeated nations and rough territories were very important for the country, because they are the important industry resource. In the treaty of Neuilly, they counterbalance took Bulgarias power from the access to the Mediterranean. This point is VERY unfair I think everybody capacity have access to the sea peradventure youll think Im very idealist, but I really think our world might be MORE fair the great unwashed might have much rights, the keep of people might be more equal They want to weak them as much as they can, that the defeated nations wont be able to attack them again. They are ruling process solo close their self. They are SO SELFISHIn fact some points of the treaty actually helped to stop the encounter between states, for example the treaty of St Germain. In this treaty Austria was separated from Hungary and many territories of Austria were assumption away and created as new states, but actually before this treaty, the old Austrian Empire had already collapsed in 1918 and many new states had already been set up, so this treaty was only sorting out the conflict between states. This point of the treaty is really not bad, but then many millions in Eastern atomic number 63 were given self-determination and freedom to ordinance themselves. Most of its industry had gone to Czechoslovakia. nada cared about how does this country (Austria) feels, how they think about it. So after this treaty, Austria collapsed and in addition suffered horrendous economic problems.All the defeated nations had to unarm and pay reparations. This is really very close The countries that made this treaty thought only about the benefits for them and to squeeze the defeated nations as hard as they can and also of course be sure they wont be able to attack them again. Theyve never thought about what will happen if theyll be the defeated nation, if theyll have to accept this sort of treaty. Im sure if they are the one of the defeated nations, they wont agree with the treatyFrom all the points, which Ive create verbally down, I give every treaty 5 on the scale of fairness.